Wow! I just looked at my database and was chagrined to see that it is just under 2G for about 600 movies and 4000 songs.
I suspect that there is a balance to be struck here. Making the database fully relational will dramatically reduce its size, but may reduce performance in some cases, like multiple users browsing menus on endpoint devices. Replication may shorten menu response time but balloons the database size, especially with all the duplicated bitmaps. It also slows down the Mezzmo application; adding files and editing entries can sometimes be a frustratingly slow process.
All that said, I think there has got to be a way to eliminate most if not all of this replicated data, particularly the thumbnails, without an excessive performance hit. At least now I know why my Mezzmo application runs so much slower than it used to. I know for a fact that MEZZMO.DB was about 65Mb with v2.x.
Please add my voice to the chorus to clean this up. Thanks.
Bookmarks